InvestorsHub Logo

mr_sano

09/05/18 12:41 PM

#45219 RE: zerosum #45218

Wow...another fluff job that’s morphed the story once again! Honestly not many will buy this delay factor as legitimate sorry to say. LOIs to determine scope of this or that is just nonsense and even if true not necessary to report as it not material until ink hits paper. One year to get to this point??? Hahahaha!!!!

mr_sano

09/05/18 1:27 PM

#45220 RE: zerosum #45218


The demand for AOT has been high for years but I'm sure they have wanted to see AOT on a line operating.



Wow..typically real customers want to see a WORKING demo instead of the years of 3D renderings outputted by some slicked up marketing agency or Tao's gravity beaker test. Apparently, AOT is so disruptive that it generated “high industry demand” without actually achieving sales or running for more than a few hours. It was so good TCPL terminated its pilot before the minimum term and KMI saw such great benefit that they decided NOT to pay a publically disclosed contract. Pure hilarity!

jaymark

09/06/18 2:29 AM

#45230 RE: zerosum #45218

I try hard to keep a positive attitude regarding QSEP as I have a fair number of shares. This recent news is still very vague and not that different from past news offered. To say that the demand for AOT has been high for years is certainly misleading. Perhaps you meant a way to make oil flow more easily has been in high demand? As there is nothing keeping the AOT off the market other than the lack of demand that is shown by a lack of a contract or two. High demand when there is a supply offered and no purchase made means not enough demand. Considering how many billions of dollars flow through pipelines every day/month/year, one might think someone would take have taken a chance by now in a REAL LIFE, REAL FLOW, REAL USE, REAL DEAL STRING OF SITES. There has been INTEREST. There has been RESEARCH. There have been RELATIVELY MINOR TEST SITES in brief operation. But high demand would have likely caused someone to want to jump to the head of the line in order to secure all of our company's efforts to be with that particular company in order for them to save an incredible amount of money, putting them in a higher efficiency status and the ability to undersell with higher profits versus other companies. This would be huge for any company's stock and bottom line. It hasn't happened. I think High Demand is far overstating the developments (and lack of developments) that have occurred (or not occurred), over a number of years. We may be on the cusp, but I have had my hopes raised a number of times only to see more of the same. More meetings in more locations around the world and in our country, and very, very little to show for it. How is this much different than past releases in any significant way? Hooray for our side, but let's see some concrete things actually happen so we can get good news with specifics rather than the same old vague progress statements we have become used to.