Trinity3,...in the process of forwarding to you any e-mails that have been received, did it ever occur to you that the person forwarding the e-mail could alter any of the wording in the body of the message before sending? Then what?
It proves absolutely nothing whether you receive Clancy's E-mail directly sent to you or posted here on this message board. Let it go.
Further, as part of the rules of Administration here on I-Hub, a Violation of Privacy includes
the " posting of any personal identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc)".
No one should be subject to having his or her e-mails revealed here for whatever reason, nor should they be required to give you their e-mails or other personally identifiable information.
There are numerous posters and non-posters who are long term, faithful shareholders who have regularly communicated with management either by telephone, in person, or by e-mail, or through other investigative channels. Many hours of work have been put into such investigations. Be grateful if someone is generous enough to post that information here, use your own time to investigate whether it is substantive, helpful or not. In essence, please do your own due diligence. If you had bothered to send Jonathan E-mails yourself over the past months, you would have received responses very similar to those already posted, and that alone would have given you the confidence to believe in the veracity of the source.
You are completely alone in disputing the veracity of any of Clancy's e-mails, so let's drop it.
Rather than continue to berate anyone on this message board, why not direct your positive energies into something constructive.
Let me remind you about the rules of this board specifically. They are clearly posted in the IBox.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
