InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

rottenapple

10/26/06 9:34 PM

#15586 RE: rottenapple #15581

All I did was ask a on topic question and diddy gave an on topic answer. Why delete it? Why does someone want to keep information from shareholders if capnmike had already admitted he received some type of compensation?

I wonder who deleted the posts? Was it Viking65 or Matt?
icon url

whitemanfromtown

10/26/06 9:36 PM

#15587 RE: rottenapple #15581

Matt: Thanks for deleting the libellous posts.
icon url

d4diddy

10/27/06 1:33 PM

#15621 RE: rottenapple #15581

Rottenapple,

"Diddy...did you notice that my question about whether or not capnmike received any compensation from LOCH or CDEX was deleted, as was your answer?!!

I wonder what the reason was? Knowing who and why someone is being compensated by a company is definitely on topic. And it certainly is a determining factor as to how much credibility you give a poster who is profiting while the company seems to be having some financial problems.

An explaination for the deletion is in order. Do you agree?"



Yep, but don't count on it! It's not like Viking65 has been doing a stellar job of objectivity!

Besides, you don't want to start whining and complaining like posters have done in the past.

Ain't worth it.