I was invested in a company before where the company had about five law suits pending, toxic note holders everywhere but the CEO did release pr's all the time on the progress of those issues and the direction of the company.... weekly.
It's true, Dan has been on this from and that is great. It was nice of him to stop by and say "hello."
But I feel it looks like he may be saying the lawyers are preventing me from talking but I just wonder if that is even legal that a lawyer would do that. Should the lawyer be running the company?
I just worry that "hiding behind the lawyer" is one of those things you say when you don't want to do anything. But I may be wrong.
fact of the matter is Dan just does not answer any of the questions we have asked him to answer.
Maybe he can't answer questions but I am sure there has to be a way to come out and talk to us maybe even informally on ihub or via a conference call recording and let us know about anything going on with Windstream that would help people to feel confident, that our investment has a future etc. It's not so much about knowing what the company is doing this week... It's about the future.
It's been nice of Blizz to run interference but I really feel it is time to hear from our CEO. What's the big deal?
There has to be one thing, one positive thing that could be said to ease people's nerves.