That is a tough question to answer. I’ll do my best but I’m rounding up on numbers to simply and pad. All figures in CAD unless otherwise noted:
Creditors List: 64m Summary of priority charges from monitors 3rd report: 6.5m 4th monitors report has no priority charges that I could find. Keep in mind that for June and July they were in production and according to what I read in the monitor’s report were able to meet their cash flow needs. I’m leaving out cash on hand and receivables for good measure.
Here is a summary from a post I did a while back where I play devil’s advocate:
Creditors list shows debt of almost 65m CAD. Let’s add 30m CAD for good measure. Total debt 95m CAD=73m USD. Plant replacement cost according to the new PWC TEASER SHEET IS 175-185m USD. Subtract 73m USD of debt from low end offer of 150m USD leaves roughly 75m USD. Patents not included in that. I’m still here because numbers don’t lie. I don’t care for the nonsense of the ceo, the leak of the bidders and the onslaught of bashers but that doesn’t change the numbers. Even an insulting bid of 100m USD for the plant puts money in your pockets according to the numbers. If I’m wrong on these numbers please contact PWC because the numbers came from them.
That’s what I got for you. I’m here because of numbers. But as always there’s no guarantee. There have been to many shanigans so far and weird ass trading. Even PWC has screwed up imo by leaking names. Don’t invest what you can’t afford to lose and remember NUMBERS DON’T LIE; NUMBERS DONT HAVE AGENDAS-PEOPLE DO
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
