InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

horst

08/15/18 2:40 AM

#38199 RE: Stock_Barber #38171

The $3.6M is simple math anyone can do from one obvious line of the 10-Q. To be more specific, it's an improvement of $3,645,042. It's not open for debate. I did make one mistake though - I assumed without reading that the column I was referencing was the trailing 6-month time frame (as it often is in SEC filings), but it was actually trailing 9-month time frame. So there's a reduction of approximately $3.645M in selling, general, and administrative expenses year over year for a trailing 9-month time frame.

Hey, I just admitted I made a mistake, by the way. It's easy to do!

Here's a screenshot of the numbers in question. See my most recent post before this for an explanation, based on SEC filings we can all locate and read for ourselves, of why that number has been reduced so drastically so quickly.