InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

stockfan100

07/30/18 5:00 PM

#145943 RE: Adipaola #145940

Thanks for sharing. Exactly as I said... a snapshot of one paragraph in 36 pages to falsely show the company's involvement is just the work of fantasyland wishful thinking!

I just read all 36 pages of the complaint filed. OWC is mentioned only as the company Friedland worked for and they were not involved in the case whatsoever. The issue Friedland and his wife have has nothing to do with the company and only to do with the stock that he held and no longer has.

icon url

I-Glow

07/30/18 5:14 PM

#145947 RE: Adipaola #145940

Sorry that isn't close to being accurate - if you read the complaint you must have overlooked the following - I am not certain how you could have missed:

On or around August 18, 2014, OWC provided an opinion letter to its transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with its issuance of stock to Intiva...

Pursuant to the compensation terms of the Global PR/IR Agreement, OWC transferred 5,134,375 OWC shares to Global on February 5, 2016. OWC provided an attorney opinion letter to OWC’s transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with the issuance of OWC’s stock to Global.

This is what you posted:

I just read all 36 pages of the complaint filed. OWC is mentioned only as the company Friedland worked for and they were not involved in the case whatsoever. The issue Friedland and his wife have has nothing to do with the company and only to do with the stock that he held and no longer has.

What I posted above proves your statement isn't accurate.

It clearly states that OWCP was complicit in the fraud.

IG