InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

malt66

07/26/18 2:24 PM

#60695 RE: Schafer #60691

He ALREADY did...

By the J preferreds...WHAT I REALLY like is THIS.

LOOK AT IT THIS WAY...

In this era of financial cost cutting, questions are raised over the true need for 256- or 320-slice computed tomography (CT) systems for cardiac imaging. There are many radiologists and cardiologists who argue a 64-slice CT system is good enough to make a cardiac diagnosis without spending twice as much for the higher-slice systems. However, those who adopted 256- or 320-slice systems say the quality of the images are superior and lead to better diagnoses in CT angiography (CTA).

System users say 64-slice scanner costs a little more than $1 million, while a 256-slice scanner runs about $2 million, and a 320-slice system costs about $2.5 million.

Diagnostic and Invasive Cardiology spoke with cardiac imaging specialists to gain their insights into this debate.

PLUS, YOU HAVE ABOUT 250k IN SURROUNDING AREAS.





WITH people moving out of the midwest, especially ILLINOIS for high property taxes and medical costs...TenneSSe is the PLACE TO BE!