InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JosephS

07/22/18 6:43 PM

#467314 RE: YanksGhost #467308

The lawsuits do no harm to the shareholders. In fact, they do the opposite. They encourage the government of treating the shareholders of equity (common/preferred) fairly.(much more so than without)

If the government offered a settlement that was fair, the shareholders would surely agree.

Totally disagree with that assertion as it is clearly false.

The lawsuits have been around for 5 years. They didn't just get filed. Even if they had, the assertion makes little sense.


Not a recco
icon url

JosephS

07/22/18 6:47 PM

#467315 RE: YanksGhost #467308

The utility model is likely less desirable than Moelis for common share appreciation. But, whatever. Doesn't matter that much to me.

icon url

bradford86

07/22/18 8:51 PM

#467323 RE: YanksGhost #467308

"The problem with Moelis is the impact on government-held warrants"

statute of limitations

not a problem
icon url

kthomp19

07/22/18 9:37 PM

#467329 RE: YanksGhost #467308

The timeline can't go too far off the rails given that Watt's term ends on January 1 2019.

But Trump's economic agenda is under a lot of duress and I think Secretary Mnuchin is going to grab for the outcome that favors him best. That would not be Moelis but the FHFA/Dworkin version of utility structure.



The warrants allow for much quicker realization of value than a utility structure, especially one that involves recapping only using retained earnings, keeping the government "on the hook" in the meantime.

icon url

action8101

07/22/18 10:33 PM

#467332 RE: YanksGhost #467308

There’s a rumor that ackman sold his shares. Something about salute of limitations?