"Sorry, but the LAW confirms what I stated to you earlier. Damages are paid to the litigating plaintiff in these examples which was the FHFA, not the enterprises of FNMA or FMCC. As the litigant, FHFA is the stipulated recipient of all damages resulting from the agreements.
Your point is made moot by virtue of the simple fact had FHFA decided to return those damages to F&F, they would have been returned to Treasury in quarterly dividends, anyway.
Sorry but that is just the way the law works. WISHING it was different doesn't matter."
YanksGhost,
All could wish that one could do whatever they think is right by just saying sorry. But if you read dissent opinions, there are judges who wont agree with you.
If one goes by your logic, then victims of fraud and theft will have no incentives to file any complaints because Gov will only benefit.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
