Replies to post #26153 on Mexus Gold US (MXSG)

[EightRealtor]

Long story short, no gold and more excuses!

[T-Hawk]

In addition, the company is researching the possibility of funding for the project

.

Are there enough MXSG longs willing to do another round of funding?

[gitreal]

Vat leach testing is showing that the high sulphide ores from the 8 Brothers has to be pretreated in order to increase the recovery.

Yet another example of the hobby miner not doing the requisite metallurgical testing BEFORE attempting production.

What are they going to use that wonderfully welded VAT for now.....a trash bin?

[gitreal]

Mexus is pleased to announce that after a series of legal battles the company is now able to move forward at the Santa Elena mine.

No 8-K. No mention as "subsequent events". Don't investors have a right to know some details about this series of legal battles? Did Mexus claw back even a single peso from MarMar?

What serious gold producer, major construction company, etc. would want any involvement with this POS?

[gitreal]

Eight head assay samples were taken averaging 1 g/t Au and 50 g/t Ag with one sample showing 30 g/t Au and another sample with 800 g/t Ag.

Any math wizzes out there? Assuming the eight head samples fairly represented the material loaded into the VAT, how do you average 1 g/ton Au, with one sample at 30 g/t? At a minimum, the 8 samples would average 3.75 g/ton, even if the other seven samples were zeros.

Aside from the curious math, why are they trying to VAT leach partially oxidized material averaging only a g/ton?

[gitreal]

About 80 tons of this oxidized ore was crushed to <3 inches

3 inches? Really? Why bother?

Under normal circumstances, vat leaching is done with ore crushed to sand or powder.

https://www.911metallurgist.com/blog/vat-leaching-of-fine-crush-gold-ore

No wonder gold recovery was 1.25 percent.