InvestorsHub Logo

LTE

07/17/18 10:17 PM

#3266 RE: brooklyn137 #3265

<<I think it may take a little longer than we hoped, but I'm looking forward to seeing the new patent.>>

brooklyn137:

It takes years from filing the initial / provisional patent application
until the USPTO grants the patent. And it will be a big IF with
regard to whether or not the application's claims are accepted for
the patent. If these improvements are too similar to other innovations,
the claims will be rejected due to prior art. These claims can
be tweaked with the examiner to come to some resolution as to what
doesn't read on other innovation's prior art. But this might wind
up being too similar to the Blair patent family's CTS 1.0 innovations
which obviously weren't commercially viable. Magmar made that very
clear for those willing to read his posts.

I'm not trying to burst anyone's bubble, I'm just stating how it works.

This is from today's press release:

<<Ben, along with Director of Research and Technology, Dr. Peter Cohen, has filed patents on a new application of the technology, CTS 2.0, which offers significant improvements in operational efficiency and production capacity. Additional information on the new CTS 2.0 will be released in the coming months as final development and engineering will be completed.>>

PS:

I have nothing against Slager - time will tell if he's successful.

But I had bad taste with regard to how De Liege was running ALLM
with multitudes of grossly misleading press releases, etc.

Maybe Slager will run a more honest ship? Time will tell.