Replies to post #53039 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

That was the correct number of days since Kyle........

announced being on the wreck. He later said, with full knowledge of the conditions and visibility that 2017 would be the year, after finding NOTHING in 2016, according to the list I posted provided by Seafarers to the Bureau.

In fact, according to what they provided to the Bureau, nothing was found until August 2017 on Area 1, which was the 40 spikes. The “ this is the year” comment by Kyle was made in the Spring of 2017 in the promo interview.

The reports, which I post show the number of days worked, and it’s a frequent topic here.....ie dive season.

To suggest I am in someway trying to misled is rather amusing. The reports speak for themselves. The picture Kyle has painted in those promo interview is far rosier than the reports themselves.

If they were on a wreck, it should be in the report. Surely you can agree with that. All I’ve seen found on Area 1, as of the Jan 2018 report is 40 spikes found in 3 days of August 2017.

When the state sends the July 6th report I will gladly post it.

Day 725 since Kyle announced being on the wreck, which he said was 1/4 mile from Area 2.

Next?

[Raider21]

Quote: Ever try to find a light switch in the dark in a forriegn area?
_____________________________________

One is to be impressed with the fact that SFRX divers are professionals even if not experienced historic shipwreck divers. That said understand that professional divers are trained to work in zero visibility conditions. I question if their conditions are total zero visibility. In these conditions reliability is put into the application of sensitive ferrous/non-ferrous u/w metal detectors and the magnetometer (ferrous metals only) along with ones u/w compass and the sense of touch. Why is it that excuses are continuously rendered for lack of results?