InvestorsHub Logo

runncoach

07/14/18 4:26 PM

#6449 RE: Battle Ready #6448

Company has repeatedly stated they are willing to partner. Based on the number of employees and size of the company that would probably be in our best interest. Likely to happen at some point. People have been wrong about Capital raises here for quite some time. We may get one and we may get funding and other ways

Whoopddew

07/14/18 4:59 PM

#6450 RE: Battle Ready #6448

I’ve thought from the 1st day this company will partner. They are open to that path BP is hungry for a AD treatment it just comes down to trial results IMO if they have something we’re golden if not just another tombstone in Alzheimer’s cemetery

Cyosol

07/15/18 7:23 AM

#6451 RE: Battle Ready #6448

They will definitely have to partner with someone at some point (since there is no way a company with 5 employees could ever distribute millions of doses to patients on its own), but I hope it does not happen this year.

Here's how I see it:

1. In about a year, positive results could send this stock soaring and create much better fundraising/partnership conditions
2. Neurotrope will need to raise more funds before the trial is completed to keep the business running

So how do we solve the problem of raising funds in a way that maximizes shareholder value?

You might say that a partnership is the best solution, that is, a different company agrees to fund Bryostatin-1 development until market entry and then receives some sort of compensation for distributing it.

The company could then receive new shares for their investment and/or a share of all revenues from any future Bryostatin-1 doses that it helps distribute to patients.

If done correctly, this type of deal would remove the need for any future fundraisers after the new shares for the partnership have been issued.

However, this would still leave the warrants intact which will further dilute shareholders. It would also give other companies leverage over Neurotrope, since they know it is running out cash soon and needs the money.

A different approach would be to just issue new shares to investors like they did before, but again, this would leave warrants intact and lead to even more dilution.

If they decide to give warrant holders some sort of discount in return for immediately exercising their warrants though, they not only prevent further dilution now, but also give themselves enough time to be able to negotiate better partnership terms after results have been announced.

At least that's what I believe.

Whatsupp

07/15/18 3:39 PM

#6452 RE: Battle Ready #6448

It all depends on timing. I would guess that they will want to have more cash available before this latest trial is complete. Raising cash from the warrants probably makes the most sense. 1) it does not dilute the stock and, 2) it prevents the situation where the company is in a dire need for cash to move forward. The best time to raise cash is before you need it.

My hope is that a partnership is for a license agreement to manufacture and sell bryostatin with say a $50m up front payment to fund P3 and other future trials.