Nutoo-to'explain-is-the-4-misleading-replies-that-had-time-frames-Hugo-sent-:-orelease-fin's..Would it have been interesting to not reply instead of having investors watching for a date to see critical financial data asked for. Also in post that you find needs explanation the answer as to why depends on how this c.e.o. wanted the relationship over the past months with his shareholders. From I can say anything I want and Thats not my concern to. I have reason to take the time I do ( meaning the hours spent doing the audit from 50 hours per week to 4 hours whenever..). Translated the c.e.o does not have to give his explanation and it can be any number of reasons because of this except a liable suit came later on losses incurred selling after deadlines were not met ..which this c.e.o obviously was not concerned with. But in securities case law ..cash loss is damage to someone's funds as loss incurred during period of consecutive misleads coming in Corp. Emails for answers as to when the fin's used to make decisions would be available and removal of stop sign..The fact that he sent them is to review each one and see the deadline set passed. Why he would put his integrity to send firm transparent replies that Would be expected to be met to at the deadline set remains as his business strategy and actually unkniown. Connecting the dots we can know is that this record of financial information overdue is going to be released in in a new phase of progress made..Of I was looking for a possible reason in the mystery of why a c.e.o. would do this creating a possible future feeling of mistrust in his replies is to follow the money -business trail back to the last release of fin's on nov' 2017 and follow foward to July and there is the only thing we know meaning what was the real reasons to take 8 months plus to show thus to us and how many hours per week was it worked on -translation on this if your pushing for it The accountants and lawyer work it 6 days a week with overtime and if your not then you can take your time..This is only one opinion thereate others .Would also like to see my shares bought at .008's rise asap and it becomes unthinkable to see a decline again.. As many feel the same ..but some may be watching to see what is coming next - because it's been months since an **email from our c.e.o. has been shown to meet the deadlines said to see stop sign removal with released fin's - Thats his history of answering stockholders questions this year. That is in fact the only explanation to get out of this except the release comes after some good progress is made .lots up to investors to decide why..as you asked..GLTA..
Nutoo-the -explaination-would include-- 4-consecutive-*misleading-replies-that-had-time-frames- out by not -happening with out update until letters were 'sent asking what happened and Hugo-sent the next not very honest time frame for the requested release-of the these fin's..But wrecks also a great question to ask.. Would it also been best ( in my opinion ) to not send repeated mis-information with bogus.. deadlines each time a new email reply and again not ever met repeating the mistake--and then--to add to it..there was no public update as to why..and the question remains to ask..would it have been interesting to *not reply-- all instead of sending mis-information-having investors watching for a date to see critical financial data asked for. Depending on the way people feel about straight foward replies-in money matters.. Also in post..you say.. What is explanation ..and it actually should have one butt this c.e.o. chose not to send a p.r uodate on this situation ..instead just these emails and so.. the answer as to why depends on how this c.e.o. wanted the relationship over the past months with his shareholders. From I can say anything I want and Thats not my concern to. I have reason to take the time I do ( meaning the hours spent doing the audit from 50 hours per week to 4 hours whenever..). Translated the c.e.o does not have to give his explanation and it can be any number of reasons because of this except a liable suit came later on losses incurred selling after deadlines were not met ..which this c.e.o obviously was not concerned with. But in securities case law ..cash loss is damage to someone's funds as loss incurred during period of consecutive misleads coming in Corp. Emails for answers as to when the fin's used to make decisions would be available and removal of stop sign..The fact that he sent them is to review each one and see the deadline set passed. Why he would put his integrity to send firm transparent replies that Would be expected to be met to at the deadline set remains as his business strategy and actually unkniown. Connecting the dots we can know is that this record of financial information overdue is going to be released in in a new phase of progress made..Of I was looking for a possible reason in the mystery of why a c.e.o. would do this creating a possible future feeling of mistrust in his replies is to follow the money -business trail back to the last release of fin's on nov' 2017 and follow foward to July and there is the only thing we know meaning what was the real reasons to take 8 months plus to show thus to us and how many hours per week was it worked on -translation on this if your pushing for it The accountants and lawyer work it 6 days a week with overtime and if your not then you can take your time..This is only one opinion thereate others .Would also like to see my shares bought at .008's rise asap and it becomes unthinkable to see a decline again.. As many feel the same ..but some may be watching to see what is coming next - because it's been months since an **email from our c.e.o. has been shown to meet the deadlines said to see stop sign removal with released fin's - Thats his history of answering stockholders questions this year. That is in fact the only explanation to get out of this except the release comes after some good progress is made .lots up to investors to decide why..as you asked..GLTA..
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
