Replies to post #51276 on Data443 Risk Mitigation Inc (ATDS)

[Brownbear2049]

You would take a deal to avoid litigation and the cost and uncertainty involved

[H2004]

Answer(s) to your question regarding "MMG," has been pointed out in previous posts, or has provided a pathway to understanding "Why would MMG take that deal when they could have so much more?"

Here are some hints: "MMG," check out Rhonda Keaveney and David Keaveney Shareholder Advocates LLC., and an attorney named Peter L Chasey. Oh, and do not forget "SMALL CAP COMPLIANCE, LLC." An interesting reference is listed on the website listing a familiar person named in an SEC filing...

http://www.smallcapcompliance.com/references.html

https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/sec-filings/12675876/content/html

It's all a bit overwhelming trying to grasp a full understanding of the forces at work, but I believe what we have experienced with regards to the "merging fiasco," has in fact been a real learning experience.

Therefore, I am very thankful to 'nodummy' and 'Mr. Clean' for some very valuable lessons in shell companies and the scams associated with them. You might want to read their posts in greater detail.

Cheers!!!

[abrantley]

Because MMG had a worthless note prior to us taking over. They are probably ever so gracious to get something at all.