InvestorsHub Logo

Homebrew

06/29/18 10:36 AM

#170266 RE: singhinvestor16 #170261

LOLOLOL...If screwing investors, and ZERO accomplishments are good things.

...Excellent management and good business decisions ...

foxwoodsfan

06/29/18 12:05 PM

#170274 RE: singhinvestor16 #170261

“Mr. Cellucci is a highly competent and well educated executive” Ummmmmmm yeah. This CEO is a charlatan supporting his wanna be lifestyle by screwing over retail investors. Any political connections he may have had have most likely distanced themselves due to his bloviating induced failures. He has and continues to associate himself with other flunkies and failures. The word competent has no affiliation with this CEO.

4toSchool

06/29/18 10:41 PM

#170306 RE: singhinvestor16 #170261

LoLoLo. "Cellucci is careful who does business with." LMFAO. I guess TC is so careful that he won't do business with any potential clients. $BVTK

TenKay

06/30/18 8:58 AM

#170311 RE: singhinvestor16 #170261

“Take a look at how many shares Microsoft had 30 years ago and look at the outstanding now. There is not a NYSE or a successful NASDAQ company that does not dilute“

That is just flat out wrong. Microsoft has never diluted its stock. Microsoft’s OS today relative to 30 years ago is a function of FORWARD SPLITS...NOT dilution.

Someone who held 100,000 MSFT shares prior to the first forward split would hold 28,800,000 MSFT shares today. They have done 9 forward splits in their history.

On the other hand BVTK has NEVER done a forward split. They have done two reverse splits. So by comparison, someone who held 100,000 BVTK shares prior to the reverse splits would only have 4 shares today (yes...just FOUR) out of an OS now of over 9 BILLION shares now.

Almost ALL of the BVTK shares in the market are as a result of note conversions. The use of convertible debt has been the only source of funding for BVTK. Exchange traded stocks use very very little convertible debt...the few that might.

The comparison of the change in the OS of BVTK to Microsoft is ridiculous.

RN1

06/30/18 11:33 AM

#170312 RE: singhinvestor16 #170261

He has had for years to try and build value to this so-called company. This company instead has never turned a profit. He relies on starry-eyed people to buy into his nonsense and by his worthless chairs being dumped at the worst convertible debt terms I've ever seen.