Replies to post #54179 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Reverse split? Doesnt matter if it stands on its head. No body wants it. Nobody needs it. I think it'll just go eat worms.

[DeerBalls]

No, never a reverse split and we were in the .02s last fall, before the PTAB wins! VPLM has said, many times, no reverse split.

[nyt]

You could also say it did a 5/1 split since Dec. It was 45 cents then and 9 cents today, the usual long slide downward it always has done (see 5 yr chart) after the hype/promo/news spikes. You'll next hear about how it was .0125 before Dec and now a big 9 cents, but that means nothing when you consider it was 7 cents about 11 or 12 YEARS ago. Then you'll hear about how that was an entirely different company, but that's what these carnivals do...is change names, business models & mngmt all the time. The company began 20/21 yrs ago. Abiut 10/11 yrs ago w/this name, and 5 yrs ago with the sell the whole shabang and forget the years and years of building up investors w/the voip services, model. So you've got your choice of the 5yr/10 yr/20 yr plans and to my knowledge they never made a dime. I could be mistaken about that technically, but I've never heard of any successes. Lots of hype, super touts, promises and even lies. They always claim to be the industry leaders, but no one in the industry, I repeat NO ONE EVER has supported thst claim or even so much as acknowledged or recognized them. They have never attended or had any presence in any industry conferences of any kind, anywhere in the world. But you will be hearing endlessly about the PTAB wins and that you should have endless, years long patience.

[DeerBalls]

Here is a good post, by another poster:

VoIP-Pal.com filing additional infringement petitions is a sound litigation strategy. While these new petitions have no impact on active cases referenced below, these new filings force Apple to address new counts while managing active claims. Of course, Apple has the resources to handle concurrent claims; nonetheless, it is sound litigation strategy to force a defendant to engage in defending itself in multiple fronts.

Procedurally, it stands to reason that the following suits currently in litigation will be consolidated:
VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-00271-RCJ-VCF
VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Twitter Inc., Case No. 2:16-cv-02338-RFB-CWH
VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 2:16-CV-00260-RFB-VCF
While hard to believe at times, our legal system strives for efficiency. To that end, it would seem counterintuitive that VoIP-Pal.com would file three independent lawsuits; however, VoIP-Pal.com's initial litigation strategy was appropriate because provided a safety-net/testing ground for VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.'s legal arguments. For example, IF one matter happened to be thrown out based on PTAB findings, the remain two matters would be still be active. VoIP-Pal.com Inc.'s counsel would than be able to adjust legal strategy to ensure the remaining matters proceeded. Now that nearly all outstanding PTAB matters are final, the district court will seek to consolidate litigation for both efficiency and to avoid disparate rulings on similar matters.

IMPORTANTLY, and in my professional capacity, I cannot emphasize enough how significant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc.'s successful navigation of all PTAB IPR challenges ON THE MERITS is in terms of the potential for favorable outcome in district court. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. and its counsel's management of PTAB was nothing short of extraordinary--I encourage everyone with interest in VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. to keep that in mind as litigation starts to proceed in district court.

Finally, withholding updated damages totals (in the above refrenced active matters) until after VoIP-Pal.com's requested case management confrence in VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple Inc. (filed 5/23/2018) is heard, in my professional opinion, is appropriate. Generally, in litigation postured as this matter is, issuing global damages once all cases are proceeding and/or consolidated is advisable. There are many reasons for this strategy, a few of which being:

1.) it prevents having to issues multiple damages adjustments which can result in conflicts; and

2.) issuing a global-updated-damages total once all interested parties are consolidated under one setting (same judge) or at least on the same litigation track can help facilitate settlement negotiations. This is because typically only the presiding judge can compel the parties to engage in mediation. Accordingly, at the forthcoming case management conference in VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple Inc., I anticipate that VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. will request that VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. v. Apple Inc. will be consolidated with the other two matters.


Cheers all,


Oh, sorry, almost forgot... All of the above is just my opinion. I am a licensed, practicing attorney with a primary focus on litigation. I don't claim to know all the intricacies of matters discussed above but my opinions above are based on my professional experience and research i've done independently--so take them as you will.

I encourage you to all to do your own due diligence and form your own opinions.

[DeerBalls]

VPLM is currently is suing aapl, t, vz, twtr and amzn. The total, damage claims estimate out at North of $10Billion! $1Billion equates out to around $.65/share.

[MIKE2OO5]

Reverse split hhhhmmmm authorized will be maxed out soon they will have to increase or do a reverse split.July will tell us as restricted comes into the market....next week many will cash in to avoid losing profits 3-5 cent area could hit July!