Replies to post #141202 on Sino Agro Food Inc (fka SIAF)

[ks1977]

with just a grain of salt

I hope you use more than just a grain ;-) One thing is for sure; Someone is deliberating spreading false information about SIAF on the internet, which unfortunately gets entangled into the real issues we have.

I know no one personally who has seen the facilities

Neither do I, although I have met with an investor who has. Also we know that ECAB has been there (there is a podcast in Swedish on Nordnet about his thoughs on SIAF) as well as D'Alessandro. Hyperboy has posted many videos from the locations (I'll limit this topix to TRW here) and I believe we have posters on this board who has been (and I believe I've also seen some posts from earlier shareholders who has been there as well, posting after they have sold out bashing Solomon). If you don't want to believe longs (and former longs), then go with undercurrentsnews (at least that should be able to kill the "only cheap cement pouring" nonsense).

It's a good thing to be sceptical, espesially when it comes to Solomon, but just imagine the magnitude of it is SIAF is a scam; Aandt has provided plenty of links that matches SIAFs filings in terms of the subsidiaries so all these officials (as well as the people behind the subsidiaries) must be in on it, the officials in HK has to be (since it's official that SIAF owns 36.6% of TRW), all the actors from the "staged photos" (with TRWs name in a busy market) etc etc.

Also, Tony needs to be one of the lead heads on this "scam"; he refers to "proven track record" at AF1-3, he participates on the investors tours (cfr hyperboy's videos), he showed undercurrentnews around at AF4, he talks about capex in the cc of Q1/18 etc etc.

There are real issues with SIAF, but some claims (spread as facts as well) are obviously not true and are spread to hurt SIAF. Unfortunately these claims are impossible to kill (even after proven wrong) and some people will also refuse to withdraw these claims even after provided with evidence that show the claims are wrong, hence we need much more than a grain of salt (unfortunately we also need a lot more than a grain when it comes to Solomon as well, but that's a different story)