Please read the entire excerpt from the filing before assuming that’s what I’m “angry” about. Lmao
895 shares of common stock couldn’t even satisfy the most insignificant note issued by BVTK. THAT’S the joke...
Tom has absolutely no interest nor incentive regarding BVTK. Hence why he has successfully dumped over 10 trillion shares (yes, Trillion with a “T”) since becoming CEO of the company.
gov't clearance has nothing to do with holding stock. where do you come up with this stuff?
what???? legal standpoint?
“Aside from any financial disclosure and ethics obligations mandated by the Office of Government Ethics – the 287 form is the relevant one – merely holding stocks or trading stocks isn’t a security concern on its own,” explained BradP. Moss, Esq of the Law Offices of Mark Zaid. “That’s standard financial behavior for millions of Americans.”
That sentiment was mirrored by Moss’s colleague Mark Zaid, Washington D.C. attorney specializing in litigation and lobbying on matters relating to international transactions, torts and crimes, national security.
“There is nothing within the adjudicative guidelines that would prevent a clearance holder from owning stocks,” Zaid told ClearanceJobs. “Absent violating a rule or law regarding ethics or insider trading, simply owning stocks – even foreign mutual funds – is not a security disqualification.