EUREKA, I've figured out....
.....why Wrongjoe and I can't seem to agree. We are actually looking at the 8-k in different ways. I think we can both agree that an 8-k is filed whenever a company has anything material to report (or something like that). Also, I think we both agree that the purpose of this 8-k was to report a merger agreement or share exchange agreement (call it what you will.)
Where we are running into difficulty, I think, is how we are viewing the contents of the 8-k. He believes that I am saying that the mention of audited financials is to satisfy the SEC, where it is not at all required in this case. He is absolutely correct.....and I totally agree with him there. What I believe I was probably not making clear is that I was referring to the contents of the 8-k, not the legality or necessity of the filing. What I was focused on was what I believe to be the contract between the parties, having nothing to do with the SEC. I am reading it strictly as an agreement between two parties....party 1 says I will do this, this, and this. Party 2 says I will do this, this, and this.....and when that is done our agreement is completed. Instead of financials, it could have been that party 1 will trade 2 Willy Mays and 2 Sandy Koufax for 3 Mickey Mantle and one Roger Maris. If that would have been their agreement, so be it....that is what the 8-k would have said.
It is clear in my head, but I don't know if I was able still to make it clear on paper....if anyone else can understand and write it more clearly, be my guest.
As Rodney Kings says...."why can't we just get along"...LOL
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
