Replies to post #7199 on Lithium Americas Corp (LAAC)

[tikotiko]

I used to think that few meant a relatively small number greater than 2 and from 3 to say 5 or 6. 7 or more should belong in the many category. However, I decided to use proper DD and check a couple of sources for the definition of few.


From Merriam-Webster Dictionary:
Definition of few
: not many persons or things - few were present - few of his stories are true.


From the more colloquial Urban Dictionary:
few
Generally means three. No less than three can be slightly more. Three is the most common number associated with few.
I will buy a few books at the store.

Based on the above, I hereby predict that the SP will be above $4 tomorrow and maybe above $20 or maybe not in a few years. I also hereby predict that this prediction will be 100% accurate.
Sincerely
Mr. B. LOL ;-)

[G8trlongonlith]

If you knew anything about Buffett, Nowhat,

you'd know that he isn't a short view trader, but a long view investor, who has made a fortune based on solid DD, not self-aggrandizing charts. Somehow, I'd rather use Buffett's long term play, which has made both Jet and I a lot of money and it's only getting started, than those hokey charts of yours, which never point out anything positive and of value, but rather focus on your obvious short narrative, overlooking the facts that: 1) past performance is no guarantee of future performance; 2) no one seriously contends that you can properly chart a penny stock, which LAC still is if you go by factoring in the reverse split; 3) no one seriously contends that you can properly chart a penny stock that has never made a profit and is not producing a spoonful of Li (yet); and 4) notwithstanding all of that, LAC is still up nearly 50% in the last year.

Do yourself a favor and go back and read Jet's recent Motley Fool article recommending LAC.

What a bunch of baloney those charts you post are. But each to his own. GLTA