InvestorsHub Logo

finesand

06/06/18 2:24 PM

#22995 RE: Gold Seeker #22994

gold- and the researchers doing the research, the scientist congratulating on results and so forth ..

Doubt it is all a fraud, in the end - these researchers all put their name on the line and hence risk losing all credibility.

So I would say, Burger's credibility is tainted, but would need more DD on him - the others in the long list not.

The advisory board w/ good names of people having a good paying job https://www.cytodyn.com/media/press-releases/detail/273/cytodyn-forms-scientific-advisory-board-to-advance-pro-140

Researcher: Kush Dhody, Jeffrey M. Jacobson, Jacob P. Lalezari, Melanie A. Thompson, ... Paul J. Maddon
Most of them also holding a credible position.

I understand your negative fraud DD angle, sure thing.

I researched and debated Pro 140 credibility with two Phd's of mine, exactly from this perspective: Can this be a fraud?
Our conclusion was 'in no way' would have all these people put their name on the line, risking a jobless future.
The papers all peer reviewed also supporting the data would need to have been falsified.

But we always try to tackle this exact question at least once a week (o8>