There's obviously a 'sinister' possibility that he's been so wrong since April that there's no point in archiving. I doubt that because if he was calling for a 'major bottom' in October 2002, no reasonable Elliot timeframe analysis, as I understand it, would then make him go back to being bearish in March or April of 2003.
I think it's more reasonable that it's done for purposes of protecting content that he's sending out to subscribers. If you read the last two archived pieces on gold, you'll find that he recommended staying long up to $371, then shorting down to $320, then going long again for a rally up to at least $350. Looking at a historical chart of the last 6-7 months in gold, that seems like a pretty good call, all made in advance.
Hey, I'm going to write an e-mail to this guy and ask him to give me a free subscription, now that I've done all this shilling for him tonight. <g>
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
