..It is the next sentence down from the one you bolded out..
"In consideration of the settlement agreement, both parties have agreed to ***dismiss*** their respective claims against each other."
If they ""dismissed"" each others claims then we had no infringment.
..and I would "think" that CDEX paying ASD a royalty is something other than an acknowledgment of infringment..
It is a "fixed royalty" one of the weakest types of royalties ...so I've read..
We will have to see how fast we move into Canada..I know I read where we needed to meet certain regulations and licensing requirements to move out of the United States and that was our (CDEX) responsibility..we said that in the Baxa Agreement.
Maybe riding under ASD's Umbrella will make it easier and cost efficent for us to gain entrance into the marketing World...
Because there is nothing fair and equitable for both parties by CDEX paying a royalty fee...
... and ASD getting by with invalidity...
Being invalid takes away the right to even have the patent in the first place...Doesn't it?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
