InvestorsHub Logo

I-Glow

05/24/18 5:59 PM

#140546 RE: gruber72 #140527

The shares were indeed gifted to Friedland - do you think a company without any revenue and no pathway to revenue is going to pay a serial scammer like Friedland $7 million for Investors Relations if the OWCP insiders weren't going to benefit from the gift of 5.1 million shares.

From January 16, 2004:

Dear Mr. Friedland:

This is an official CITATION, issued pursuant to section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), 47 U.S.C. § 503(b)(5), for violations of the Act and the Federal Communications Commission’s rules that govern telephone solicitations and unsolicited advertisements.

[ 47 U.S.C. § 227; 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200. A copy of these provisions is enclosed for your convenience. Section 227 was added to the Communications Act by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 and is most commonly known as the TCPA. The TCPA and the Commission’s parallel rules restrict a variety of practices that are associated with telephone solicitation and use of the telephone network to deliver unsolicited advertisements, including fax advertising.]

https://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-90A1.html

Friedland was a well known scammer for many years - and OWCP got in bed with him.

IG