That's not how it works. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim it was filed. quote]the philosophic burden of proof lies upon a person making unfalsifiable claims, rather than shifting the burden of disproof to others.[/quote] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot Incontrovertible proof is incontrovertible, by definition. I can't post a link to something that doesn't exist. But the one claiming it has been filed could if it existed.