Replies to post #139823 on OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp (OWCP)

[I-Glow]

I suggest you read the Friedland complaint much closer - here you go:

Pursuant to the compensation terms of the Global PR/IR Agreement, OWC transferred 5,134,375 OWC shares to Global on February 5, 2016. OWC provided an attorney opinion letter to OWC’s transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with the issuance of OWC’s stock to Global.

LMAO!!! There it is - OWCP provided a fraudulent 144 Opinion Letter from a Disbarred attorney.

OWC provided an attorney opinion letter to OWC’s transfer agent from a disbarred attorney

So much for the nonsense about Friedland supplying the fraudulent 144 Opinion Letter:

Once again for the record..yes..OWCP provided the opinion letter that was given to them by JF who used a disbarred attorney..NOT OWCP

Obviously you don't know how a TA operates.

Why would OWCP want to remove the restrictive legend on the stock certificates - it is because they were complicit in the fraud.

But there is more:

On or around August 18, 2014, OWC provided an opinion letter to its transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with its issuance of stock to Intiva.

IG