A feature size, like SRAM cell size, is a much better indicator of actual achieved density than some pitch values, since it is a matter of many factors, how much you can integrate on a given area.
So, Intel claims to have a real 14nm process and proves that with smaller fin pitches etc, but its SRAM, which consumes much of todays CPU/SoC area, is significantly less dense than that used by AMD on Globalfoundries. I have much doubt that it is different for standard logic, what almost all the rest of the CPUs are made of. In the end, Intel seems to cherry pick dimensions where they have a lead and not talk about overall density, which is what counts, in the end, not nm of features. In the end, Intel may have a lead for some metrics, but loses when it comes to actual density. This is only getting worse at 7nm and Intel won't be able to fight AMD just by process leadership. Not possible for them anymore.
That certainly doesn't mean it's a done fight for AMD. The design is at least as important (I'd say even more important) than a process lead. Intel will have to do lot's more than it did in the past, though, to keep ahead of AMD. Losing its lead in prcoess as well as CPU design will have a horrible impact on the company. We'll see if Intel is paranoid enough this time.