InvestorsHub Logo

ADVFN_greedfear

05/02/18 1:41 PM

#22126 RE: weasel6667 #22125

Could not have said it better.

finesand

05/02/18 1:57 PM

#22127 RE: weasel6667 #22125

weasel- nonsense, I stated the financial weakness all the time.
Still, for me Pro 140 outweighs this weakness by a multitude.

May shorts or flippers play until the events occurs, hopefully you are 'in' while doing so (o8>

Saltz

05/02/18 3:01 PM

#22131 RE: weasel6667 #22125

It’s not forbidden. It’s a difference of opinion.

The real question is as Bulldog stated “what would you differently?” That is why I disagree with your opinion. I don’t see anything in your Posts that define what you would do differently that they are not doing.

You are correct, SP is critically important as referenced because it dictates the price of capital which impacts the value of our investment. The company knows that and is open to any suggestions that could be implemented to positively impact the SP. They will continue to raise in small increments until the playing field changes. All I’m saying is Tony C and management IMO is much more competent than you state.

This dialogue is called investor fatigue which is directly tied to the current value of our investment compared to perceived value. A disconnect that translates into who the f... is running the show. The market dictates SP not management which is associated with risk. We are on the cusp of taking a quantum leap forward in terms of derisking Pro-140. The market will not ignore that.

Your opinion is respected and understandable. I just see it differently.

misiu143

05/06/18 11:38 PM

#22263 RE: weasel6667 #22125

reading your posts , are you connected in any way to Currah. ( he came to this board , now you are here ,..... just curious )

I see you on the other board , and the way you posted your 8 posts here in May 2018 , made me wonder ....