InvestorsHub Logo

ricklths80

04/26/18 5:11 PM

#269140 RE: moviesam #269127

NONE-OF-THAT IS TRUE. ALLOW ME TO EXPLAIN, AS IF EVERYONE DOESN'T ALREADY KNOW THIS. LOLOL

FIRSTLY, I asked for PROOF OF INTENT, and I haven't heard it yet.

Let's start with summer of 2102. LOLOL. I believe "summer of 2012" was meant? That's when Nanotech was paid to launch VODwiz but didn't perform, correct? but somehow that's HHSE's fault? sure. whatever.

Wasn't June 30th 2012 the FIRST audit/Form10 target date? What happens after filing the Form 10? FUNDING. TRADITIONAL FUNDING. But EVERYONE knows how the Hogan Taylor audit was sabotaged by the shorts. EVERYONE.

So, let's recap. Nanotech didn't perform. Audit was sabotaged. Proof of sabotage submitted to FBI. VODwiz stalled. With me so far?



They knew they couldn't launch VodWiz in summer of 2102 but still announced it.




VODwiz can't happen without FUNDING. DUH? LOLOL. Audit process has undergone multiple attempts, including when it was actually FILED in March 2015, but auditor was sanctioned by the SEC for audits he had performed with companies other than HHSE. But, somehow this is HHSE's fault. Yeah, sure, whatever. We won't talk about a short's admission of "causing" that auditor's SEC sanction. No matter.

So, announcing VODwiz launch in anticipation of filing F10 and getting Traditional funding/financing to launch the site is NOT an intentional lie. It would've been easy for a CEO to dilute the stock and obtain toxic financing to launch VODwiz, for the sake of launching VODwiz. No doubt the shorts would've loved the dilution, but not the shareholders. I personally would prefer to see VODwiz launched properly. Without dilution.

They've done the same announcement year after year and still nothing.



Mother Goose actors' scheduling issues were addressed in blog late last year. A cast change may be necessary, but it will happen. And when it does, it's game over for the shorts. Actually, it will be game over way before that. So, there is no truth to this statement below.

Mother Goose is and always has been nothing more than blog fodder.



Anyone who knows anything about movies knows that the audience reaction is very hard to predict. Major studios encounter the same problem, not that their problems are comparable or relevant to HHSE. A title may be expected to be the largest ever, but audiences ultimately decide. HHSE gets paid no matter how a title perfoms. REVENUES ARE REVENUES. As a small Indie film distributor, HHSE's job is to place smaller titles into a limited number of theaters (lessons learned from the movie "12" wisely prevents them from going "wide"). Their intent is to maximize the post theatrical revenues (DVD/BR/VOD/TV/Cable), and obviously, they must be successful as evidenced by the fact that they haven't needed to dilute for OVER TWO AND A HALF YEARS NOW. That FACT is not an "accidental occurrence" for a pinksheet company, where 99% of them dilute the chit out of their shareholders . Everyone with me so far? LOLOL.

Last years " Cannes Announcements " have never materialized. Every movie they release is supposedly going to be the biggest ever when they know that can't be due to limited release plan.



Now that EVERYONE read the rational explanation above, EVERYONE knows that there is absolutely no truth to the statement below. LOLOL. Well, EVERYONE except for the shorts.

Everyone knows their announcements are meritless. EVERYONE.