Replies to post #137851 on OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp (OWCP)

[I-Glow]

That isn't accurate - first Hirsch quotes the infamous efficacy report - then why isn't it published your argument has no scientific merit.

From September 14, 2017:

During this period, we completed a pre-clinical efficacy study in psoriasis with unique, and what we believe may be breakthrough results; we previously reported an up to 70% reduction in biological markers directly related to this disease

Hirsch just stated that "up to 70% reduction in biological markers" - but in your post you stated:

You can't put an efficacy result on biological markers, that's what the first study was done on

That proves what you posted isn't accurate.

The efficacy study of biological markers could and should have certainly been published.

Remember you are the one who stated the following:

Farmer7
Saturday, 01/28/17 11:33:55 AM

Regarding efficacy tests dates of completion:

I've seen on here people confused over the dates of the efficacy test being done. There is actually phases too it and the first phase is done Tuesday of next week, the phases continue until end of march which is why some have conflicting reports. With that being said the company has said via email back too me regarding this issue that they will" keep on filing and reporting regarding the efficacy test"! So for those of you on here who think you won't see results until the end of march, you are wrong. We could see a report on the efficacy test as early as late next week!

You were the one who stated everyone should see the efficacy report in February.

But oddly you have now changed that to a efficacy report on biological markers is impossible - although Hirsch states differently.

IG