InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Mr. Fister

04/18/18 12:59 PM

#135187 RE: jyyoo #135184

The question (unfortunately) comes up because Siaf has an issue with dilution and financial liquidity, combined with delay of a megaloan and an ability to "mislead" investors who with good intentions try to understand the reports and how the heck we are trading at 0,45 usd.

icon url

Agnes_1

04/18/18 1:02 PM

#135188 RE: jyyoo #135184

Agree
icon url

RealDutch

04/18/18 1:27 PM

#135194 RE: jyyoo #135184

You are criticizing me, moi, for posting factual information from the 10-K? :-)

You don't seem to understand. It is these (toxic or non-toxic) notes that drive the share price of small OTC companies. A lesson everyone should have learned by now. But I guess not. So unless you want to eat dirt for the next 6 months, I suggest they file an amendment to the 10-K sooner rather than later. Not to mention the problems ECAB must have with the description of the note in the 10-K, after they just settled their own.

And no, it doesn't matter one iota what Garrett tells someone in an email or over the phone. The 10-K rules.
icon url

modes948

04/18/18 2:10 PM

#135197 RE: jyyoo #135184

He basically did not confirm or deny either interpretation.
He may be saying that he just does not plan to convert fully in a way that will totally destroy the share price.
Then I cannot understand why neither him nor FD asked the company to PR the agreements between them.
Then can he tell us what these 5 Million shares issued in 2018 are for?