Replies to post #69122 on Infrax Systems Inc (IFXY)

[samroux]

This it too generous.

Allow me to further illuminate.

I can't even keep up with all the lies and permutations over the years.

FUTL (FutureLand) I think was something before it was FUTL, then became AEGA, then went back to FUTL. It was diluted, reverse split, and now diluted again. FUTL has contract agreements with HTCO (Talari basically has a contract with himself).

HTCO (Hemp Tech Co) changed from BLDWD, which housed the CB scientific subsidiary (CBSC - diluted, reverse split) that FUTL just "acquired" Apotheca from (Another fake (illegal) Talari to Talari company transaction to issue insiders shares). Then HTCO was changing to "Nuvus".. which I don't even remember if that happened / what happened with that. HTCO was diluted massively and, similarly, had a massive reverse split.

FWDG (FutureWorld Corp), which was FutureWorld Energy, diluted, reverse split, diluted again.

OPCON (OptiCon) was changed to IFXY (Infrax), diluted, reverse split, diluted, reverse split again. And then, uh, Infrax Systems purchased HempTech Corp from FutureWorld Corp (another Talari to Talari deal to issue insiders shares).

HEMP (Hemp Inc.), another subsidiary spin-off from.. uh, FWDG, with a puppet CEO, diluted and reverse split.

And this is what I am remembering off the top of my head. Talari literally spins off new subsidiary shells and, through a series of obfuscation that involves name and ticker changes / ludicrous PR's and acquisitions, continues to wipe out shareholders.

He has never been successful in anything he has touched. It has never been the intention He has never generated revenue. Everything they do is from the sale of shares.

And that brings us up to now and the "this time will be different."

And since this posting was created some months ago, the charade has only continued in the exact same fashion. Talari, even though he pumped the whole "HTCO becoming Nuvus" a long time ago, finally got around to starting that con by having HTCO just recently become NUVG, and just like the bogus agreements HTCO had with FUTL, Talari is now using bogus agreements between NUVG and IFXY to pump IFXY. Same exact pump. Now that NUVG has a clean share structure, you can bet on that being the next ticker they dilute to trips after they've milked all they can out of FUTL and IFXY.

Also, the illegal acquisition of the already Talari owned Apotheca (it wasn't even registered as a business entity when they acquired it) that they made to issue themselves shares, which they didn't disclose the terms of until they "sold" it (hilariously, as it has absolutely no value) to PCFP (empty shell) for shares of PCFP (that have no value except for whatever they'll be able to dump them to market for (which they admitted they plan to do) because all Talari / Cox do is sell shares) and, upon completion of the sale of Apotehca, FUTL shareholders finally learned that Talari / Cox paid themselves a $100,000 convertible note. Got that? In short, Talari paid himself a $100,000 note to acquire a subsidiary he already owned, didn't disclose it, dumped FUTL to a nearly 5 billion O/S, and when Cox was asked about where the dilution was coming from and why no terms for Apotheca were disclosed, he gave a big shrug and "we'll discuss it at a later date."

Next up, IFXY ticker change! The share selling, subsidiary shuffling, ticker name changing machine just keeps on going!

These guys are serial con artists. Absolute scumbags. They've rinsed and repeated the same scam so many times, it should be incredibly transparent to anyone that their entire livelihood is dependent on their ability to fabricate stories and sell shares.

Their next reverse split, which is inevitable, will be their EIGHTH reverse split. This isn't because they've had "hard luck" getting a business going, even though that's what they want you to believe by blaming everyone but themselves. It's on purpose. That's the scam. The business IS fabricating stories, selling shares and blaming others. Nothing more.

[riskyron]

Completely False And Inaccurate Information, whether opinion or not! The story of containers to grow cannabis is not in any way, shape or form BS??? Containers to implement the vertical grow process developed by NUVUS, by the way, was started years ago prior to the rise of the legalization of medicinal cannabis. These BS containers as you call them, enable states where the legalization of cannabis has occurred to grow cannabis 24/7/365 in 4 season locations. Warehouses can house many stacked containers aka vertical grow facilities to produce medical cannabis which benefits many people suffering from very debilitating disorders and diseases. Five years ago HTCO and IFXY developed technology that enabled cannabis to be grown in these containers...as well as tents...depending on the quantity required. Given the environment, IFXY developed AI, IoT and EMS technology, the Growdroid, to enable vertical grow containments as well as farmers to more closely monitor and control the strains of cannabis grown depending on the scientific need of the drug. Along with AI, IFXY developed LED and EMS technology from their development of similar technology they were using in their Smart Grid space...this is the safe and secure data transfer across the power grid (similar to blockchain). I have no idea what your "SOLAR FARM" reference is to??? Currently, IFXY and NUVUS are developing mobile mining units, which can be powered by reusable energy, solar being one, to mine crypto at the cheapest possible cost since anyone that knows about MMU's know their distinct advantage is the decentralized approach to mining crypto and reducing the cost and increasing the profitability of crypto since it is dependent on power...in other words the most successful miners are those that do it at the cheapest possible cost of power. Wide spread fraud you are referencing in this link you have posted 50 times at least is due to the fact that companies are TRYING to enter this growing space without past history of being in it. Clearly Sam Talari has been it for almost a decade and it is finally becoming relevant with the increased number of states and countries legalizing cannabis. Whether the dots can be connected currently given the unique and "newness" of this technology and growing market by the mass investors here in the OTC is IRRELEVANT. The business will speak for itself as it and the market continue to grow and evolve. It is MUCH MORE than a one sentence attempt to discredit the extreme need for this technology specifically by people I know that can benefit from it...forget about the PPS!!! I'm talking about the need for this medicine and the need for this technology to be understood! The ability to fund NUVUS is critical to that especially since banks are not willing to attach to their name to funding MJ. This is why crypto and blockchain is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT! Sam, along with Cox, Verghese and the entire team are building a much needed conglomerate of business units. I don't care if they raise the capital internally or externally, they are doing it without debt if you are interested in the technical of the balance sheet. Everyone knows the SEC is all over ICO's, bad ones per the article link posted 50 times, but the NUVUS ICO has been running long enough to surpass scrutiny and it has been scrutinized...without ONE issue found! IFXY cannot be described by one (extended) sentence description. The PPS will take care of itself, in maybe a week or maybe a year, in time as the business continues to grow. This business is more important to the people who need it than the minute by minute, blow by blow, of the PPS!!! AI, FinTech and Blockchain are the most important aspects of this business development for the best interest of people who need it! IFXY has the trifecta and has been developing it for a number of years. Investors who understand it will make significant returns, those who do not, they can be on the sideline and watch. Either way...IT'S MORE IMORTANT THAN THAT!!! By the way...when you are developing something this important, it is greatly needed to add some "fun" to the mix and that is Galleon Quest. For investors and the team, this "fun" will be a highly profitable diversion to the significant work of NUVUS and IFXY! GQ will be relatable to many more people than blockchain, AI and IoT.
#knowwhatyouown

[Jerry70]

IFXY. I Agree that both Talari & Cox are in the Share Selling Fairy tales for years but i cant see either stepping up and followering through with anything but i can see that SEC,s Jay Clayton Suppending IFXY and put it tradingon the greys before Talari can dream up another Fairy Tale share selling SCAM and do a R/S and Start the New Fairy Tale all over again IMO. IFXY

Widespread Fraud in ICOs and Penny Stocks Shocked SEC’s Jay Clayton

FINRA issues new Investors Bulletin:

Corporate Actions by Public Companies—What You Should Know

From FINRA's Office of Investor Education as published today.

https://www.finra.org/investors/highlights/corporate-actions-public-companies-what-you-should-know

Including this warning:

"Be Wary of Announcements Regarding FINRA "Approval" of a Corporate Action

Companies undergoing a corporate action often issue a press release or other communication, such as a tweet or other social media post, to provide details of the change. For instance, a company might announce a new corporate name that reflects a change in product lines or business focus. However, in the past, some companies have used these publications to suggest that FINRA has somehow "approved" a corporate action or that a corporate action will be effective once FINRA approves it. To clarify, this is not the case: FINRA does not approve corporate actions."

The specific language is important - regulators, including FINRA and the SEC, do not "approve" any corporate action. Instead, FINRA will process any corporate action requested by companies (no matter how crazy they are) unless they are considered to be "deficient" under the very narrow and specific reasons contained in Rule 6490:

"3) Deficiency Determination
In circumstances where an SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action is deemed deficient, the Department may determine that it is necessary for the protection of investors, the public interest and to maintain fair and orderly markets, that documentation related to such SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action will not be processed. In instances where the Department makes such a deficiency determination, the request to process documentation related to the SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action, as applicable, will be closed, subject to paragraphs (d)(4) and (e) of this Rule. The Department shall make such deficiency determinations solely on the basis of one or more of the following factors: (1) FINRA staff reasonably believes the forms and all supporting documentation, in whole or in part, may not be complete, accurate or with proper authority; (2) the issuer is not current in its reporting requirements, if applicable, to the SEC or other regulatory authority; (3) FINRA has actual knowledge that the issuer, associated persons, officers, directors, transfer agent, legal adviser, promoters or other persons connected to the issuer or the SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action are the subject of a pending, adjudicated or settled regulatory action or investigation by a federal, state or foreign regulatory agency, or a self-regulatory organization; or a civil or criminal action related to fraud or securities laws violations; (4) a state, federal or foreign authority or self-regulatory organization has provided information to FINRA, or FINRA otherwise has actual knowledge indicating that the issuer, associated persons, officers, directors, transfer agent, legal adviser, promoters or other persons connected with the issuer or the SEA Rule 10b-17 Action or Other Company-Related Action may be potentially involved in fraudulent activities related to the securities markets and/or pose a threat to public investors; and/or (5) there is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the security."

finra.complinet.com/en/display/display.html?rbid=2403&record_id=12829&element_id=9364&highlight=6490#r12829

In the absence of one of the reasons above, FINRA will process the requested corporate action. But it is certainly not "approval", as FINRA has one additional course of action available to them in questionable cases that cannot be denied under FINRA rules - referral of the case to other regulatory authorities, particularly the SEC. FINRA recently began posting on their website regulatory actions taken by other regulators which they state were as a direct result of FINRA's initial referrals. No doubt many of the actions against individual companies, including SEC suspensions, utilized information obtained during FINRA's processing of corporate action requests.

http://www.finra.org/newsroom/actions-resulting-referrals-federal-and-state-authorities

Just because FINRA processed a corporate action for a questionable company doesn't mean they didn't make a referral to another regulator for investigation and future action. Just another reason why no one should believe that because FINRA processed the request it means FINRA "approves" of the Company and they are "clean". It doesn't.