InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BAMF31

04/13/18 11:53 AM

#136168 RE: I-Glow #136165

Content without context is useless misleading drivel and an out right lie to attempt to make an agenda appear to be true.

The sec document provides the context. Pulling bits of information from a document does not provide the context in which it is written when reading the entire document.

Please provide the context from the sec document... Let me help... In the context of which it was written you'll find that the letter was provided by Friedland NOT OWCP.
icon url

eggbert

04/13/18 12:00 PM

#136173 RE: I-Glow #136165

You make me want to buy more OWCP
icon url

stockfan100

04/13/18 12:01 PM

#136174 RE: I-Glow #136165

I hope this baseless claim comes with free fries and drink too cause it is worthless and didn't survive unscathed already when SEC's clearly didn't name name OWCP in the case. Of course, this is just one of the hundred times this worthless claim was answered on this board.

won't survived unscathed

icon url

gruber72

04/13/18 2:55 PM

#136212 RE: I-Glow #136165

Wrong on all counts. Completely false.
icon url

gruber72

04/13/18 3:01 PM

#136213 RE: I-Glow #136165

OWCP did not GIFT shares to Friedland...he was given shares as compensation, which is a very common practice. And once again, a disbarment doesn't erase everything an attorney did during his legal career. It doesn't change anything legal that was done during said lawyer's career.

But you already know both of these things.

icon url

stockfan100

04/13/18 3:23 PM

#136219 RE: I-Glow #136165

the ongoing...



Yup! already over 10% UP ONGOING before even the 10K and 10Q are out!

Couldn't have a better free entertainment anywhere while waiting for OWCP news!

I am sure the whole investment community agrees with me! Keep up the good work while PPS keeps going UP ONGOING in 2018! :-)