Content without context is useless misleading drivel and an out right lie to attempt to make an agenda appear to be true.
The sec document provides the context. Pulling bits of information from a document does not provide the context in which it is written when reading the entire document.
Please provide the context from the sec document... Let me help... In the context of which it was written you'll find that the letter was provided by Friedland NOT OWCP.
I hope this baseless claim comes with free fries and drink too cause it is worthless and didn't survive unscathed already when SEC's clearly didn't name name OWCP in the case. Of course, this is just one of the hundred times this worthless claim was answered on this board.
OWCP did not GIFT shares to Friedland...he was given shares as compensation, which is a very common practice. And once again, a disbarment doesn't erase everything an attorney did during his legal career. It doesn't change anything legal that was done during said lawyer's career.