InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

trading_cyclist

04/10/18 8:33 AM

#63512 RE: jckrdu #63509

So said the frog the curiously warm pot of water
icon url

Gantor50

04/10/18 8:47 AM

#63514 RE: jckrdu #63509

I agree. While the situation definitely appears to be odd, there is no conclusive proof (as of yet) that those 5 people are gone from anywhere beyond the changing of a PowerPoint deck. I think it's a huge leap to assume that their departure is some kind of foregone conclusion.

Also, from my personal experience with multiple M&A events, a company would NEVER eliminate 65% of it's Senior Management staff BEFORE an actual M&A announcement. NEVER. You would never do anything like that unless the paperwork is signed and legally it's a done deal.
icon url

$5.95akadawson-m

04/10/18 9:00 AM

#63516 RE: jckrdu #63509

Not to jump on you at all, but, who says "that the lack of response from IR points to something." IR is just not responding because, in my mind, she has stated the same thing to these individuals ad nauseam. What else can she say to assuage these individuals. She has better things to do with her time and so do they. What's that idiom that Cattdogg likes to use - "Where's there's smoke, there's fire." Well, in this particular case, there's no smoke and no fire. There is no fiction. And IR sees this and chooses to not reply.


icon url

williamjay

04/10/18 10:34 AM

#63581 RE: jckrdu #63509

Thank you for your assessment. I completely agree. The idea that the company is being sold basedon five executives no longer being with the company when there is no proof to support it is quite a stretch. I am not saying that this is not possible. Also, it appears something is up. But, say it is a buyout based on this info. is completely unfounded.