Minute 14:25 to around minute 16 of the Mell Gibson Dad video seem to make it clear that he did not get Fat derived stem cells (adipose) and instead received infusions of growth hormone and other factors derived from umbilical cords from multiple infants that were then cultured in a lab.
The doctor interviewed described buying and throwing away a majority of umbilicals to screen for specific cells that do what they want. This is a reason I like USRM, though. Cells from someone else's umbilical cord,someone else's growth factors or else someone else's DNA or DNA product is how the competition does things and it should be FDA regulated.
USRM only uses the patients stem cells from the patients fatty tissue to help regenerate / heal the patient. For me its like the difference between peanut M&M's modified by scorpion DNA to make them bug resistant which is a process that should be tested / regulated, or just regular old peanut M&Ms except in the case of NON-USRM companies, it involves wasting large numbers of newborn baby umbilical cords to do it the competitors way.
USRM does not use any baby derived by products for their clinics that I have heard tell. IMO, this makes USRM the better company with the better approach. Although full disclosure: The Doc in the Mel Gibson video does allude to their clinics successfully using Adipose stem cells successfully since 2006 for similar things to what USRM does. The difference is this Doc says his clinics stopped doing that because the FDA hated it and preferred the clinic do the umbilical cord stuff instead. I think the Doc in the video said he didn't know why that was.
Imagine folks figuring out the value of their baby umbilicals to the wealthy and deciding to sell off the parts to the highest bidder at the time of birth? I don't want us to go there, and USRM does not go there in any of my DD research.
I like USRM.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
