InvestorsHub Logo

ctrumabll

04/07/18 10:44 AM

#15964 RE: Monroe1 #15960

I did check out your conference- did you?

This doesn't exactly support your position. In fact, it looks like the results of a desperate "Google" search for anything supporting their position, without understanding their point.

Here, let me help you...

Here is the steering committee for your convention:

https://www.syngasassociation.com/2018-committee/

Funny- very heavy on fertilizer companies, not too strong on coal. In fact, nobody from coal. Also instructive is this little snippet, from the Wikipedia entry on one of the steering committee members:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffeyville_Resources

A Texaco coal gasification plant, originally located in Cool Water, California, was disassembled, refurbished, and its technology converted to be able to gasify petroleum coke instead of coal. It was then reassembled to form the heart of the nitrogen fertilizer operations.

So, there you have it: the only member involved in coal-to-gas moved away from it, and nobody is using coal for fertilizer.

Perhaps you should have looked at their "who we are" statement:

https://www.syngasassociation.com/about-us/

The SynGas Association is an organization of ammonia, hydrogen, ammonium nitrate/nitric acid, urea & methanol producers – along with the material and service suppliers that support these industries.

Did you see that? The part where you are using a convention of commercial fertilizer producers and trying to pretend that it has ANYTHING to do with coal, incorrectly? You really need to check your facts.

This whole "coal to gas" fantasy belongs in the same strange world as people who believe in the "Jewish Banking Conspiracy" and that Michelle Obama was a transvestite.

Finally: you know what is easier to use to make carbon-based products? Oh yeah- petroleum. Every Bakken well drilled and every Bakken pipeline completed kills coal just a little bit more.