I hope you are right, please let us know what you learn. The one difference from the past is that Arcm.st is no longer trading, which makes for a very strange situation. I agree with you that if the amavf shares corresponded before to real shares than that should still be the case. But i am still concerned there is no clearly articulated requirement or perhaps even ability to apply Swedish squeeze out law to an ADS. Then what? Does GE just get to claim the remaining shares? Seems like it would become an obscure question of law and jurisdiction where amavf holders would only get representation if they hired lawyers.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
