Replies to post #135344 on OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp (OWCP)

[CanItBThisEZ2Make]

This is exactly what the SEC stated:

"ORDER: The parties' stipulated motion for preliminary injunction24 is granted. The court denies as moot the remaining motions2 ,17 , and18 . The hearing set for April 5, 2018 is vacated. Until further notice, the Court enters the following preliminary injunction against the Defendants and their agents: The Fidelity account ending in 466, held by Lane 6552 LLC, is frozen up to the amount of $3,059,492.15; The First American State Bank account ending in 426, held by Lane 6552 LLC, is frozen up to the amount of $943.02; The First American State Bank account ending in 7593, held by Kathy B. Friedland, is frozen up to the amount of $25,000; The Friedland Defendants are enjoined from selling, transferring, mortgaging, encumbering, or collateralizing, or authorizing or allowing the encumbering or collateralization of, the condominium located at 2800 S. University Boulevard #27 in Denver, Colorado; and The Friedland Defendants are enjoined from selling, transferring, mortgaging, encumbering, or collateralizing, or authorizing or allowing the encumbering or collateralization of the property located at 466 Meadow Road in Snowmass, Colorado. By Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 3/29/18. (msklc2, ) "

Quote taken from line 25:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/23861139/United_States_Securities_and_Exchange_Commission_v_Friedland_et_al

If OWCP was not guilty of anything or this ticker would of been frozen as well and we would be waiting for a settlement. The volume would be zero and the price would remain what it was on March 5th. So other than annoying investors who do not understand that investing means you are buying in to a company because you are 100 percent confident in that company and willing to be patience until that company achieves their goals. OWCP's share price did not drop due to Jeffrey Friedlands fraud, but rather because of scare tactics that chased many away and due to low volume while 99.7 percent of shares are being held. OWCP now has an even better management team, and once the Passover holiday season is over it's back to business.

https://theculturetrip.com/middle-east/israel/articles/11-things-you-never-knew-about-passover-in-israel/


GO OWCP $$$$ HUGE RUNS ARE ABOUT TO HAPPEN $$$$

[I-Glow]

Of course I am right just as I was about OWCP not owning any patents - I suggest you read the complaint - because it was clearly stated that OWCP was complicit in the fraud. Just as I have been about everything concerning the OWCP scam.

It is also obvious that you have never worked with a Transfer Agent. If you call the TA and ask if they will send you a NOBO list - their response will be that the company must send a letter (not a email) before they can provide you any company information.

The SEC stated and I am not certain what you don't understand about the following: "OWC provided an attorney opinion letter to OWC’s transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with the issuance of OWC’s stock to Global."

As you can clearly read - OWCP provided a Fraudulent 144 Opinion Letter to the TA.

Here you go even more: "On or around August 18, 2014, OWC provided an opinion letter to its transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with its issuance of stock to Intiva."

Damn, that had to leave a mark.

You do understand that the SEC investigation is ongoing - as I have stated this generally means that the SEC has turned the investigation over to the Justice Department for criminal charges.

Bignitz and friends have a great deal of criminal exposure - actually much more so than Friedland - what he did was civil legal liability but providing a fraudulent 144 Opinion Letter from a Disbarred attorney is certainly criminal liability.

Your analysis of the SEC Complaint against Friedland is faulty on several levels - you are basing your argument on the word purported used in Item 46 of the Complaint.

But in Item 10 it states "Friedland (1) helped his wife open brokerage accounts at two broker dealers for Lane 6552 LLC, a brand new company they created with no apparent business purpose and Kathy Friedland as its sole owner; (2) transferred ownership of Global’s OWC stock to Lane 6552, providing false information and a misleading opinion letter from a disbarred attorney to the transfer agent in order to get the restricted legend removed from the stock"

Sorry - but it was a fraudulent Opinion letter - and it was provided by the OWCP.

The other faulty argument is the statement that Friedland gave the TA the Opinion letter - that is true - but OWCP provided Friedland with the opinion letter.

"On or around August 18, 2014, OWC provided an opinion letter to its transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with its issuance of stock to Intiva."

Then there is the following: "Pursuant to the compensation terms of the Global PR/IR Agreement, OWC transferred 5,134,375 OWC shares to Global on February 5, 2016. OWC provided an attorney opinion letter to OWC’s transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with the issuance of OWC’s stock to Global."

The TA won't act on a 144 Opinion Letter until they contact the company and verify that they know about the Opinion Letter and they authorize the issuance of the stock and remove the restrictive legend so that the shares are free trading immediately.

This is too funny - you do understand there wasn't multiple disbarred Attorneys writing opinion letters:

According to the SEC complaint against Friedland it says “from a disbarred attorney”, but we don’t know any additional information about the attorney OWC used in 2014 and 2016. He/she may have had a current license to practice law at that time. Wether the attorney was disbarred prior to or after August 2014 or February 5, 2016, is information not given by the SEC.

Hopefully you don't believe there are is a a "herd" of disbarred attorney involved in the OWCP scam.

It seems this is the first SEC complaint you have read - I have read hundreds and followed many through criminal and civil litigation.

You don't often see that SEC clearly state the investigation is ongoing.

Bignitz and friends better start investing in soap on a rope as their will be criminal charges against the OWCP insiders.

IG

[I-Glow]

Why don't you provide some proof that OWCP is a real company - post a document that proves OWCP owns just one patent.

Where is the efficacy report - why hasn't it been published?

Why since 2014 hasn't OWCP published any research.

Where is the psoriasis cream that Hirsch stated was market ready 6 months ago?

Why has the company gone radio silent since the SEC complaint was filed - except for the lame 8-K that stated the following: "to report the resignation of Mr. Jeffrey Friedland (“Mr. Friedland”) as a member of the Registrant’s Advisory Board, effective immediately."

If the company knew about Friedland's nefarious activities and weren't complicit - why was he fired years ago?

You are trying to defend a company who gifted a well known paid pumper 5.1 million shares - shareholders that believe the OWCP hype are in for a long hard road - as it will get much worse for the company and shareholders.

I posted that Friedland was a paid pumper with a tainted history but I was attacked and just like the patent not existing - I was 100% accurate about Friedland.

You once asked this question: "Can anyone explain why Mordechai Bignitz the CEO does not own any shares while all of the other management do?"

LOLOL!!! I think you know the answer - it was because he profited from the fraud.

IG