InvestorsHub Logo

///M3

03/27/18 3:22 PM

#1305 RE: was BoxedIn #1304

You should probably check out the share structure zero need. Just hit the ask

Spartanfan1

03/27/18 3:34 PM

#1306 RE: was BoxedIn #1304

Ha ha... That is funny! Nice try- this Board is a close-nit group that has been here a long time. Don't waste your time on statements like that- you aren't going to convince anyone.

Trades Mcgrady

03/27/18 3:38 PM

#1307 RE: was BoxedIn #1304

They would have done it before issuing the "control block" of common stock (same shares we own)

Note 5 – Subsequent Events:
There are no other events of a subsequent nature that in management’s opinion are reportable.

Pursuant to an amended consent judgment order filed with the State of North Carolina on December 14, 2017, the Company will issue 18,500,000 shares of common stock as free trading shares exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 to a controlling shareholder, and a control block of 100,000,000 shares of common stock will be issued to be held in the treasury by the Company.



It would have been the first thing they did. Way before issuing common stock, then announcing the merger and the name/ticker change. They wouldn't go through all of this process, announce name/ticker change and then say oh now btw screw you new shareholders. and ourselves