InvestorsHub Logo

kabblooi

03/22/18 3:22 PM

#42095 RE: cold_water #42093

Your metaphors all cannot apply except for the possibility of a person running due to the speeds associated with the vehicles you mentioned. In order to effectively patrol an area, the RADbot will not be going 50mph through a parking lot; more than likely, the speed will be in the 5-8mph range in order for the visual data to be accurate (otherwise, the video will like the jump to light speed in 'Star Wars' on the side cameras). At 5-8 mph, there is plenty of time if they used the sensors that a Roomba uses (but i'm pretty sure the RADbot has better sensors). NO impact from a vehicle the size of the RADbot will cause a fatality unless it runs over a cricket, in which case, yes, you're right, the RADbot is deadly and should be listed as an anti-personnel vehicle.

No 3rd party vendor videos exist or will exist in the near future because it's not smart business practice. You don't need to mention it 203 more times; we get it. You want something that does not and will not exist.

Lollerskates

03/22/18 3:33 PM

#42096 RE: cold_water #42093

In your metaphor each of them drive a different craft. I don’t see how you think that each of them would be able to do the job of the others. That’s absolutely insane.

Also do you see any of the other security robot companies with 3rd party videos? This is an industry still in its infancy and you cannot give anything to your competition.

Look I want cheap shares just as bad as you but you gotta come up with something better than Uber and lack of 3rd party verification. Call the company and it’s dealers if you need verification.