InvestorsHub Logo

janice shell

03/21/18 3:39 PM

#59555 RE: daveymoore #59551

Once again--you really should read yesterday's posts--here's the letter:



EFLN has been trying to get the Caveat Emptor removed for months. The Stefanovics have said as much. It is only reasonable to suppose there's been a fair amount of correspondence between them and OTC Markets about it.

My guess is that Ljubica did at some time receive a substantially similar letter, with two important differences:

The line ending: ..."therefore we are able to remove the Caveat Emptor flag at this time" actually read: "we are NOT able to remove the Caveat Emptor flag at this time".

And the date was altered.

If the intention of the letter was to inform the company that the CE had been removed, the closing line, asking Ljubica to "please direct all further communications regarding the removal of the Caveat Emptor sign to me directly"--would make no sense at all. But of course if the letter was to inform the company that the CE would NOT be removed, it would make perfect sense.

I think that clarifies the issue sufficiently.