Support: 888-992-3836
Copyright © 2023 InvestorsHub Inc.
Replies to post #218016 on Biotech Values
MadCityCyclone
03/20/18 8:27 PM
#218020 RE: DewDiligence #218016
NY1972
03/20/18 10:25 PM
#218022 RE: DewDiligence #218016
DewDiligence
04/02/18 2:37 PM
#218201 RE: DewDiligence #218016
A pre-specified interim analysis, conducted by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) of the efficacy and safety data for the study in an overall population of 275 patients as well as the two primary study target patient populations (node-positive and TNBC) after a median follow-up of 19 months, demonstrated a clinically meaningful difference in median disease-free survival (DFS) in favor of the active arm (NeuVax + Herceptin), a primary endpoint of the study, with hazard ratios of 0.67 and 0.61 in the intent to treat (ITT) and modified ITT (mITT) populations (i.e., those who received at least one dose of vaccine or control) as well as a 34.9% and 39.5% reduction in relative risk of recurrence in the active versus control arms in the ITT and mITT populations, respectively. A clinically meaningful and also statistically significant difference was found between the two arms in the cohort of patients (n= 98) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), with a hazard ratio of 0.26 and a p-value of 0.023 in favor of the NeuVax + Herceptin combination with a 70.4% reduction in relative risk of recurrence in the active arm versus control. Similarly, a clinically meaningful and statistically significant difference was found between the two arms in favor of the combination in the cohort of patients not receiving hormonal therapy (n = 110), with a hazard ratio of 0.24 and a p-value of 0.009 with a 74.1% reduction in relative risk of recurrence in the active arm versus control. This pre-specified interim analysis also showed an adverse event profile with no notable differences between treatment arms. The addition of NeuVax to Herceptin did not result in any additional cardiotoxicity compared to Herceptin alone.