InvestorsHub Logo

Stock_Barber

03/18/18 1:24 PM

#129332 RE: franck92 #129331

The significance and importance of the relationships is what has been misrepresented...

And failure to publicly deny a relationship is far different than a confirmation of it!

That argument is invalid...

It is commonly referred to as an "Argument from ignorance"

Argument from ignorance (from Latin: argumentum ad ignorantiam), also known as appeal to ignorance (in which ignorance represents "a lack of contrary evidence") is a fallacy in informal logic. It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is false because it has not yet been proven true.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance


Koog

03/18/18 1:41 PM

#129333 RE: franck92 #129331

In almost 6 years if it is was false we would know it.
Show us articles, companies, official persons who said that what Epgl released was false.


Ummm, no. No real company is going to waste precious time to refute a pump by a share-selling scheme effectively operating out of a broom closet. Why should they?