Replies to post #156700 on Bravatek Solutions Inc (BVTK)

[cngreen]

The 40% is simply some assumed or imagined business that would flow through BVTK’s books for which we have not yet even seen a penny.

really because you were giving darkpulse some type of evaluation when you insinuated darkpulse's evaluation would be so big that it won’t work out well for EXISTING common shareholders of BVTK.

TenKay Member Level Friday, 03/16/18 11:53:48 AM
Re: pennypauly post# 156637 0.000
Post # 156640 of 156685
That type of “deal” is a reverse split by another name. O’Leary and Cellucci will control exactly how the merger would be recapitalized...and it won’t work out well for EXISTING common shareholders of BVTK.

They use the fake value of DPT to buy the fake value of BVTK and cut the sharecount of the existing commons of BVTK in the process. And given Cellucci doesn’t own any common stock no skin off his back...and Dennis gets access to buyers of the dilution he can then unleash.

Im saying BVTK has some valuation if Darkpulse has a valuation and if bvtk merged with darkpulse it wouldnt nor couldnt be a lopsided merge as you suggest.