Replies to post #156680 on Bravatek Solutions Inc (BVTK)

[cngreen]

i am referring to your post.

TenKay Member Level Friday, 03/16/18 11:53:48 AM
Re: pennypauly post# 156637 0.000
Post # 156640 of 156685
That type of “deal” is a reverse split by another name. O’Leary and Cellucci will control exactly how the merger would be recapitalized...and it won’t work out well for EXISTING common shareholders of BVTK.

They use the fake value of DPT to buy the fake value of BVTK and cut the sharecount of the existing commons of BVTK in the process. And given Cellucci doesn’t own any common stock no skin off his back...and Dennis gets access to buyers of the dilution he can then unleash.

Darkpulses valuation is coming from the orders/sales that Darkpulse is sharing with bvtk for 40%. Now i know not all the orders are 40% but a lot are.

hence if darkpulse is valued at 1.5 bill because of a sales valuation then it only makes sense that bvtk has a high percentage of that valuation too through net revenue payments to bvtk. this is of course if darkpulse was to RM with bvtk. therefore the existing share count of the commons would not be cut as much as you are claiming. that's what i am saying.

[derek foreal]

hes speaking about the JV in which BVTK would get 40% for anything incured due to BVTK of which I and many others believe will be many secured contracts due to Tom.

Tom is also Co-CEO of DarkPulse and him and DO have a strong relationship.