InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

SUNYN75

03/14/18 11:17 AM

#63431 RE: Jamis1 #63430

Agreed on the premise of viability going forward.

However,

None the less "No Signatures provided " simply a copy of the offer.
If "DocuSign" it requires the parties to submit an "Electronic Verified Signature" in the appropriate signature blocks. Docusign signatures would be contained within the blocks.



Regards

Sunny:>)))
icon url

SUNYN75

03/14/18 11:20 AM

#63433 RE: Jamis1 #63430

L2 was not mentioned in the agreement provided. How would they have "Standing" ??
Regards

Sunny:>)))
icon url

wooferwax

03/14/18 11:24 AM

#63434 RE: Jamis1 #63430

its in the past. If Sri or Steve would sell dots, coffers would never be dry. It will be interesting so see the financials from last year eventually to see if Steve could do any better than Sri. So if there are not significant monies from samples, online and Freschfield will that finally be Steve's fault and not Sri's? For some I am guessing no.

Another note, would the connection to Canaccord be an attempt to go private? What does that scenario mean to a common shareholder?

How long do you think we wait for Q's and K???? Seems like a long time to edit filings even with a missed auditor window. Honestly, I think it is so when we do see them no one is going to care about those failures because they are so far in the rear view mirror. I am sure they will be accompanied with more GTG updates and another influx of 10billion or something.