InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Traderbx

03/13/18 11:17 AM

#59220 RE: Traderbx #59209

"The patient who died had advanced refractory metastatic cervical cancer that progressed following treatment with other therapies. After entering the trial about one year ago, the patient received six combination cycles—11 doses of listeria-based cancer vaccine axalimogene filolisbac and 21 hits of Imfinzi. The first five cycles passed without incident. That changed with the most recent round of treatment.

Medical problems began following the first dose of Imfinzi but were managed, Advaxis CSO Robert Petit said on a call with investors. The patient then received a second dose of Imfinzi followed by an administration of axalimogene filolisbac. The situation escalated from there.

After receiving treatment for hypotension, the patient was hospitalized and thereafter developed respiratory failure. Efforts to stop the worsening of the patient’s condition fell short and she died.

The events leave Advaxis facing the conundrum of why a patient who had previously tolerated both drugs died of respiratory failure. Prior studies suggest Imfinzi may be the culprit. One patient had died of respiratory failure in AstraZeneca’s phase 3 trial of Imfinzi in lung cancer at the time it reported data in September, and analysts at Jefferies uncovered other incidents linked to the drug and checkpoint inhibitors in general.

"We reviewed the BLA for [Imfinzi] and noted 0.8% death rate within 30 days due to respiratory failure in the safety database. This also corresponds with SAE reports of 1% respiratory failure in trials for [Imfinzi], [Keytruda] and [Bavencio] that we reviewed, suggesting 1% incidence across most PD-1/L1s. In some cases, the SAEs were reported as [cardiorespiratory] arrest, which suggests cardiac etiology and would also align with hypotension as reported for the deceased patient [in Advaxis' trial]," the analysts wrote."
icon url

gbrown6332

03/13/18 12:10 PM

#59242 RE: Traderbx #59209

AZ is well aware of the toxicity issues with their platform but no doubt feel it’s a manageable challenge where the patient benefits far outweigh the risk. They have already successfully pushed Infimzi through the FDA approval process for selected other disease targets.

It will be interesting to see if they step up and use their size and leverage with the FDA to help get the hold resolved quickly or if they have so many collaborations with other small partners they just move on leaving ADXS twisting in the wind. That will likely depend on how much value they place on the results achieved thus far with the AXAL combo.

G.B.