InvestorsHub Logo

Smallville

03/12/18 8:50 AM

#133200 RE: BAMF31 #133187

Nice. Let's throw in some exageration, too.

Link my post where i claim 'huge' dilution. There isn't a single one.

VERT is number one on the ask.

That DOES mean additional dilution.

But, I will chill for the day.



HomerBedloe

03/12/18 9:26 AM

#133205 RE: BAMF31 #133187

Nice post BAMF - but that isn't the way of the OTC. Hammer the message until everybody and his uncle are sick of it, so it becomes part of reality rather than rumor or speculation. And if you hammer enough, eventually all the counter arguments get tired and disappear, and now it is the only heard message out there.

You are correct, we all know there was/is an SEC investigation about JF and his dealings with OWCP stock. At this point, everybody has taken their side, including the option of the middle ground...wait and see what comes out next. But that isn't going to stop some people from going on and on about this possibility or that possibility - good or bad.

I-Glow

03/12/18 11:22 AM

#133211 RE: BAMF31 #133187

Sorry it isn't the dilution - it is about about fraud and OWCP being setup as a pump and dump from the beginning.

Since 2014 - OWCP hasn't published any research - they don't have any assets - and they certainly don't have any IP (such as patents).

If OWCP wasn't involved in the fraud - how is the following explained?

"OWC provided an attorney opinion letter to OWC’s transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with the issuance of OWC’s stock to Global."

"On or around August 18, 2014, OWC provided an opinion letter to its transfer agent
from a disbarred attorney in connection with its issuance of stock to Intiva."

"On June 12, 2017, OWC’s transfer agent relied on the disbarred attorneys opinion letter to remove the restrictive legend from Intiva’s OWC stock and issued a new “clean” stock to Intiva for deposit at the clearing broker for Spencer Edwards."

IG

BAMF31

04/05/18 9:21 AM

#135407 RE: BAMF31 #133187

Well lets revisit the supposed dilution topic again that Mr Smallville and others have been throwing around with no facts to back up what they say. I'll bring the actual truth and facts.

Per OTC Markets:
Outstanding Shares on 04/03/2018 = 147,758,908

I do believe that per my last post the Outstanding Shares on 03/01/2018 = 147,758,908. Therefore, NO DILUTION. Credibility and influence of some members on here this board is getting smaller each time they post something that is false.



Lets see what the actual facts about the alleged huge dilution that you've been talking about say... taken straight from the SEC filings (or from OTC Markets).

Outstanding Shares on 03/01/2018 = 147,758,908
Outstanding Shares on 09/30/2017 = 146,316,600
Outstanding Shares on 06/30/2017 = 146,022,694
Outstanding Shares on 12/31/2016 = 139,447,782

From 12/31/16 to 3/1/18 it has been diluted by only 8,311,126 shares which is 5.9% increase over a 14 month time period. If people are naive enough to think that there is absolutely 0 dilution in the OTC then they shouldn't be putting their money in the market. So yes there is "some" dilution but enough with the scare tactics about massive dilution and "warning newbies".

I know you were a huge supporter of OWCP awhile back. Fundamentals have only gotten better since that time period. I realize that you do have some validity to the SEC investigations concern so I get it but that's all that it should be is concern as an investor and knowing the the potential risk that could come with it. I believe that you've stated your concerns and all should take note and choose for themselves what they will do and move on to the next topic.